Global Sources
EE Times-India
Stay in touch with EE Times India
 
EE Times-India > RF/Microwave
 
 
RF/Microwave  

Intel, Qualcomm face-off as IP policies get deep in the mess

Posted: 07 May 2015     Print Version  Bookmark and Share

Keywords:Intel  Qualcomm  AllSeen Alliance  Open Interconnect Consortium  IP policies 

Like adding oil to the fire, the increasing complexity surrounding IP policies with regard to Internet of Things (IoT) development is getting too much to handle. Even so, the issue needs to be addressed one way or the other. But first things first. Let's try and break the dilemma down to a few questions.

How do you tell ISC Licence from Apache 2.0? Why is a Patent Non-Assertion Pledge necessary? Since when are "Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory" (RAND) terms no longer sufficient?

First thing you do, go to the intellectual property (IP) policy page of open collaborative projects such as Qualcomm-led AllSeen Alliance and Intel-led Open Interconnect Consortium (OIC).

But don't expect a simple answer. The two competing groups, both built around the IoT, provide respective IP policies, sufficiently different but similarly full of legalese. They're confusing and complicated enough to make anyone shrug and say: "Who cares? I'm just an engineer."

Hold that thought for a moment.

As I talk to the originators of such collaborative projects, I've come to realise that the ingenuity of their work done isn't limited to technical/engineering innovations. Equally important, and perhaps more critical to the foundation of these projects, are such concepts as "free software" and "open source" advocated by the engineering community, along with layers of new legal protections added to IP policies.

In comparing the IP policies of AllSeen with those of OIC, there are enough differences, both subtle and big. They include developer accessibility to code and specs, the way groups are structured and specific licences.

Andy Updegrove

Andy Updegrove

While IP policies alone aren't likely to determine the viability of one IoT camp over another (AllSeen over OIC, for example), differences might be big enough, at least in the minds of each group's promoters, to steer them on separate ways and inhibit them from joining forces, at least for now.

Did engineers win?

As tempting as it is to blame all the complexity of IP policies on lawyers, Andrew Updegrove, founding partner of Gesmer Updegrove LLP, shared a different view. It isn't lawyers but the engineering community that has led the world to revolutionise thinking about open source software today, he explained.

"Engineers have actually won the battle," stated Updegrove. The legal community has been playing catch-up with the engineers since the late 1980's when "free software" activists such as Richard Stallman wrote the first version of GNU General Public Licence.

Modern high-tech industry groups want to recruit for their cause the best engineering talent available in the world, said Updegrove. They recognise that it isn't wise to cross talented engineers who adhere to the engineering community's own code of ethics. As Updegrove stated, this value system requires that you can use, study, distribute and modify free and open software but you don't steal from the community. If you improve the code, you give it back to the community.

Instead of throwing up our hands at the complexity of IP policies, it might be time to celebrate the engineering community's sense of fair play.





Comment on "Intel, Qualcomm face-off as IP polic..."
Comments:  
*  You can enter [0] more charecters.
*Verify code:
 
 
Webinars

Seminars

Visit Asia Webinars to learn about the latest in technology and get practical design tips.

 

Go to top             Connect on Facebook      Follow us on Twitter      Follow us on Orkut

 
Back to Top