Global Sources
EE Times-India
Stay in touch with EE Times India
EE Times-India > RF/Microwave

IoT anxiety: The wait for the right protocol remains

Posted: 06 Jan 2015     Print Version  Bookmark and Share

Keywords:Enlighted  ZigBee  WiFi  building control  Internet of Things 

While there is no telling when the perfect blend of functionality and efficiency will spawn the 'ideal' Internet of Things protocol, the market will have to do with what's presently available. That said, existing protocols seem to fall short capabilities-wise, rendering various IoT use-cases to settle for technologies such as ZigBee and WiFi.

There's no clear end in sight for the protocol wars in the Internet of Things, said Tanuj Mohan, chief technologist of a building controls startup. The CTO of Enlighted, which developed its own 802.15.4 protocols, believes the outlook for ZigBee is particularly dim.

The IoT needs a set of open APIs and protocols that work with a variety of physical-layer networks, said Mohan. In this way, he feels, IoT networks should act more like IT nets. Mohan was a co-founder of Enlighted and is a networking expert who worked at Cisco, Novell and Tropos and built multiprotocol routers at Hughes.

"Anyone who tries to build a physical layer and drive a software stack based on it all the way up to the application layer is a fool," he said. "The IP and network layer should have nothing to do with the media. The last-mile protocols have some play, but they are not as important as people make them out to be. It doesn't matter if [nodes] talk over one protocol or another. In any case, you will need mediation devices.

"Today ZigBee is the most cost effective, but tomorrow WiFi will figure it out. Networks talk SNMP or CORBA, every few years there's a new management protocol. In some sense, that's what will happen in IoT, it will keep moving, and people will need open APIs."

Mohan criticised the 250Kb/s ZigBee standard as too slow and complicated for use in building automation: "You don't want the network to be the bottleneck, and ZigBee is one of the slowest of any protocols I know. It has some application in the home market, but in the commercial space it won't work. ZigBee may be used in some large buildings, but it will take a lot of handholding and custom engineering and that will cost a lot.

What ZigBee lacks

"For example, if someone streams on WiFi, the ZigBee doors may not open. So you need to make sure to use different wireless channels on every floor. You cannot sell such an approach through the existing ecosystem of electricians because they aren't sophisticated enough in RF.

"ZigBee did not learn from the networking industry. The deployments today require so much handholding the never got out of the early-adopter phase. Lighting control guys don't understand the network security they need. It's a protocol that will take forever to catch up. If a systems company like Aruba or Cisco led ZigBee, they would have been way ahead."

1 • 2 Next Page Last Page

Comment on "IoT anxiety: The wait for the right ..."
*  You can enter [0] more charecters.
*Verify code:


Visit Asia Webinars to learn about the latest in technology and get practical design tips.


Go to top             Connect on Facebook      Follow us on Twitter      Follow us on Orkut

Back to Top