Global Sources
EE Times-India
Stay in touch with EE Times India
EE Times-India > Manufacturing/Packaging

Fab tool business model for better or worse?

Posted: 24 Jan 2011     Print Version  Bookmark and Share

Keywords:semiconductor equipment industry  fab tool industry consolidation  fab tool business model 

Inspite of a rise in capital spending, 2011 expects to bring in a possible slowdown in the IC equipment industry accelerating the ongoing revamp in the fab tool industry. The past years have seen few fab constructions, leading to massive consolidation in the equipment sector. Some now view the fab tool business model as simply broken.

Fewer choices in the equipment vendor base could cause higher tool prices, less innovation and monopolies in some tool segments, such as ion implantation, lithography and metrology. Still others believe that fab tool vendors must consolidate and pool their R&D resources to tackle the next-generation technology nodes, the extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography supply chain, and the potential shift to 450mm fabs.

Two big fab tool buyers—Intel Corp. and GlobalFoundries Inc.—have markedly different views about the subject.

Consolidation in the industry has put the fab tool supply chain in peril, because there are "not enough choices" in the various segments in the vendor base, said Norm Armour, vice president and general manager for the Fab 8 project in New York state for GlobalFoundries, the foundry spinoff of Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD).

Robert Bruck, vice president of the Technology and Manufacturing Group at Intel, has a different viewpoint. "Last year at (a SEMI event), Bob Bruck posed the hypothesis to me that consolidation (in the fab tool sector) was good for customers," wrote VLSI Research CEO G. Dan Hutcheson, in a recent report.

"Being an economist, firmly grounded in anti-trust teachings, my gut pushed back. But Bob came up with a good point: fewer competitors means less duplicative R&D, which makes the equipment industry more efficient, which should translate into lower cost," Hutcheson wrote.

In any case, the fab tool industry has undergone a sea of change. During the early days of the IC industry, chipmakers built their own fab tools, because there was little or no semiconductor equipment business to speak of.

Then, starting in the 1950s and 1960s, a new crop of independent semiconductor equipment maker burst onto the scene. Chipmakers began to buy tools from a plethora of new start-ups in the arena. The fab tool business prospered in the 1980s. In 1981, there were over 300 vendors that sold equipment to 300 or fewer chipmakers, many of which had wafer fabs, according to VLSI Research.

At the time, there were multiple vendors in each fab tool segment, giving chipmakers a viable choice. For example, in the mid-1980s, the lithography market included ASAT, ASML, Canon, Eaton, GCA, Nikon and Ultratech. Another firm, Micronix, was developing an X-ray stepper. IBM and Japan Inc. were separately devising large-scale, synchrotron X-ray systems for next-generation devices.

In the same decade, the fab tool business model began to fall apart. In 1987, pure-play foundry Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) emerged, propelling the fabless industry. Since the emergence of foundries, this model has not only propelled a new crop of fabless chipmakers, but it also forced integrated device manufacturers (IDMs) to re-think their fab strategies.

1 • 2 • 3 • 4 Next Page Last Page

Comment on "Fab tool business model for better o..."
*  You can enter [0] more charecters.
*Verify code:


Visit Asia Webinars to learn about the latest in technology and get practical design tips.


Go to top             Connect on Facebook      Follow us on Twitter      Follow us on Orkut

Back to Top